Ransomware Intelligence / Groups / akira
Ransomware group
akira
Akira is a ransomware group first observed in March 2023, targeting both Windows and Linux environments, with a particular focus on corporate networks and VMware ESXi servers. The group employs a double extortion model, stealing sensitive data before encrypting systems and threatening to leak it on a Tor-based leak site if ransom demands are not met. Akira typically gains initial access through exploitation of unpatched VPN services, compromised RDP credentials, phishing, or abuse of legitimate remote administration tools. Its Windows variant uses the Windows CryptoAPI to encrypt files, appending the “.akira” extension while skipping critical system folders to maintain system stability. Ransom demands have ranged from $200,000 to over $4 million, typically requested in Bitcoin, and the group has been linked to high-profile incidents affecting education, manufacturing, and healthcare sectors. Akira appears to operate independently rather than as a Ransomware-as-a-Service, and continues to evolve, with recent variants improving encryption speed and evasion techniques.
- 11claims, 7 days
- 36claims, 30 days
- 104claims, 90 days
- 2026-04-01first seen
- 2026-11-04last seen
These are claims posted by the group on its leak site, counted when we first see them. They are not confirmed incidents, and we never name a victim.
Activity, last 26 weeks
New leak-site claims per week.
In the news
Recent stories in the security press that name akira, newest first.
Headlines are shown as the publisher wrote them and link to the original story. They are third-party reporting, not SecuritySnares findings. How stories are picked
Sectors claimed, last 90 days
Countries claimed, last 90 days
- United States 56
- Unknown 17
- Germany 7
- United Kingdom 6
- Brazil 3
- Canada 3
- Switzerland 2
- United Arab Emirates 1
- Spain 1
- Ireland 1
- Italy 1
- South Korea 1
- Mexico 1
- Netherlands 1
- Norway 1
Vulnerabilities akira exploits
CVEs attributed to akira by Ransomware.live, most severe first. Patch these first if this group is in your threat model.
| CVE | Vendor / product | CVSS | CISA KEV |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-40766 | SonicWall SonicOS SSL-VPN | 9.8 Critical | Listed 2024-09-09, ransomware use |
| CVE-2024-40711 | Veeam Backup & Replication | 9.8 Critical | Listed 2024-10-17, ransomware use |
| CVE-2023-48788 | Fortinet FortiClient | 9.8 Critical | Listed 2024-03-25, ransomware use |
| CVE-2022-40684 | Fortinet FortiOS | 9.8 Critical | Listed 2022-10-11, ransomware use |
| CVE-2021-21972 | VMware vSphere Client | 9.8 Critical | Listed 2021-11-03, ransomware use |
| CVE-2023-27532 | Veeam Backup & Replication | 7.5 High | Listed 2023-08-22, ransomware use |
| CVE-2020-3259 | Cisco ASA & FTD | 7.5 High | Listed 2024-02-15, ransomware use |
| CVE-2024-37085 | VMware ESXi | 6.8 Medium | Listed 2024-07-30, ransomware use |
| CVE-2019-6693 | Fortinet FortiOS | 6.5 Medium | Listed 2025-06-25, ransomware use |
| CVE-2023-20269 | Cisco ASA & FTD | 5.0 Medium | Listed 2023-09-13, ransomware use |
| CVE-2023-20263 | Cisco ASA & FTD | 4.7 Medium | Not listed |
70% of successful ransomware attacks use remote encryption (Microsoft, 2024): files on protected servers are encrypted over the network from a device the attacker controls. Read our remote encryption briefing →
Newest vulnerabilities used by any ransomware group (CISA KEV)
| Added | CVE | Vendor / product | Vulnerability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-18 | CVE-2026-59310 | Broadcom VMware vCenter | Broadcom VMware vCenter Path Traversal Vulnerability |
| 2026-08-05 | CVE-2026-63077 | JetBrains TeamCity | JetBrains TeamCity Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability |
| 2026-07-29 | CVE-2026-20316 | Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (FMC) | Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Use of Hard-coded Password Vulnerability |
| 2026-07-14 | CVE-2026-15410 | SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances | SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances Code Injection Vulnerability |
| 2026-07-14 | CVE-2026-15409 | SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances | SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances Server-Side Request Forgery Vulnerability |
| 2026-07-01 | CVE-2026-45659 | Microsoft SharePoint Server | Microsoft SharePoint Server Deserialization of Untrusted Data Vulnerability |
| 2026-06-25 | CVE-2026-12569 | PTC Windchill and FlexPLM | PTC Windchill and FlexPLM Improper Input Validation Vulnerability |
| 2026-06-12 | CVE-2026-35273 | Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools | Oracle PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools Missing Authentication for Critical Function Vulnerability |
Tactics and techniques
MITRE ATT&CK techniques reported for akira by Ransomware.live, in attack order.
- Initial Access
- Execution
- Persistence
- Defense Evasion
- Credential Access
- Discovery
- Lateral Movement
- Collection
- Command and Control
- Exfiltration
- Impact
- Defense Impairment
- Stealth
Ransom demands
Opening demands in 61 leaked negotiation chats from 2023–2026.
- $100k–$10Mrange
- $400kmedian opening demand
- 61chats
- 2023–2026years
In the 40 chats that record a lowest offer, the demand typically came down to about 42% of the opening demand.
From 193 leaked negotiation chats (Ransomchats, MIT license). Leaked and contributed chats are not a representative sample: a few groups and years dominate, and big cases are over-represented. Amounts are the group's first stated total demand in US dollars. 11 of these demands were made in bitcoin and are converted at the bitcoin price on the day of the chat. Crypto demands from chats with no known date are not included. How these figures are extracted.
Track akira in the weekly brief
One email a week: which groups are active in your sector, what they are exploiting, and what to patch. Drafted from the data on this site and read by a human before it goes out. No sales follow-up.
Data sources: CISA KEV, Ransomchats, RansomLook, Ransomware.live, security news outlets · updated 12 hours ago
Sector, country and ransom-demand figures are SecuritySnares estimates made with a language model. Leak-site listings are claims by threat actors and are not independently verified; leak-site victims are never named unless they have disclosed the incident themselves. News headlines are the publishers' own reporting, shown as written and linked to the original. Methodology